<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Photo Editor FotoFlexer is not from Adobe because it’s Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/</link>
	<description>Social Media Blog, Tips &#38; Tricks for Bloggers and Social Network Users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:44:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: domnik</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/comment-page-1/#comment-197882</link>
		<dc:creator>domnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/#comment-197882</guid>
		<description>I really liked your collection and agrees about fotoflexr but I think you should include Irfanview and Gimp as well in the list. Gimp might be slightly technical but it have features equally good as Photoshop and Irfanview is really easy to work upon with its great capability to save for web and reduce image size option.&lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot;href=&quot;http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/produs.php?nume=z_clean_pores&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;acnee&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked your collection and agrees about fotoflexr but I think you should include Irfanview and Gimp as well in the list. Gimp might be slightly technical but it have features equally good as Photoshop and Irfanview is really easy to work upon with its great capability to save for web and reduce image size option.<a rel="follow"href="http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/produs.php?nume=z_clean_pores" rel="nofollow">acnee</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domnik</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/comment-page-1/#comment-197364</link>
		<dc:creator>domnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/#comment-197364</guid>
		<description>I really liked your collection and agrees about fotoflexr but I think you should include Irfanview and Gimp as well in the list. Gimp might be slightly technical but it have features equally good as Photoshop and Irfanview is really easy to work upon with its great capability to save for web and reduce image size option.&lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot;href=&quot;http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/produs.php?nume=z_clean_pores&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;acnee&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked your collection and agrees about fotoflexr but I think you should include Irfanview and Gimp as well in the list. Gimp might be slightly technical but it have features equally good as Photoshop and Irfanview is really easy to work upon with its great capability to save for web and reduce image size option.<a rel="follow"href="http://www.sanatatesexuala.ro/produs.php?nume=z_clean_pores" rel="nofollow">acnee</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/comment-page-1/#comment-71924</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorblog.com/2008/02/16/online-photo-editor-fotoflexer-is-not-from-adobe-because-it%e2%80%99s-free/#comment-71924</guid>
		<description>Is there any type of editing on this that allows you to change your hair color and clothes color?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any type of editing on this that allows you to change your hair color and clothes color?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
