Comments on: Google Wave Desktop Client Match-Up: Waver vs WaveBoard for Mac http://www.rotorblog.com/2009/11/09/google-wave-desktop-client-match-up-waver-vs-waveboard/ Social Media Blog, Tips & Tricks for Bloggers and Social Network Users Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:01:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: wiiman96 http://www.rotorblog.com/2009/11/09/google-wave-desktop-client-match-up-waver-vs-waveboard/comment-page-1/#comment-197812 wiiman96 Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:00:37 +0000 http://www.rotorblog.com/?p=4758#comment-197812 Great concepts, yes, but they are both just a browser window (without the buttons) with the wave website in them. Waver just uses a user-agent from iPhone to view the iPhone Wave Webapp. If someone would actually redesign the GUI to work with an API, maybe it could be called an application. In fact, I could have the same exact GUI for Waveboard by going to Wave in Google Chrome, and create an "application shortcut" to the site. It would look almost EXACTLY (EDIT1) the same.<br><br>Great concept, though.<br><br>EDIT1: It would look EXACTLY the same.<br><br>NOTE: Just like Gmail, Wave has keyboard shortcuts that work in-browser. Since these are in fact your browser slimmed down, the keyboard shortcuts work as they should. <br><br>NOTE2: I could compile an identical app of Waveboard in Adobe AIR in about an hour.<br>NEWS HEADLINES: Someone used a super-easy platform to display a website in a window! Here is a screenshot of the famous app: [Shows the Google Wave website] There it is! If I were to open the real application, it would be the same thing without any menus or buttons.<br><br> Final Notes: In summary, I could just make a shortcut on my desktop to go to the Wave website, and it would load just about as fast. Nothing to install, and it's the full-featured thing-a-ma-gig that is advertised to install. Bonus of using a browser: If I am done with Google Wave, I can just use my address bar to go to whatever I want next. No witing for browser to reopen. Great concepts, yes, but they are both just a browser window (without the buttons) with the wave website in them. Waver just uses a user-agent from iPhone to view the iPhone Wave Webapp. If someone would actually redesign the GUI to work with an API, maybe it could be called an application. In fact, I could have the same exact GUI for Waveboard by going to Wave in Google Chrome, and create an “application shortcut” to the site. It would look almost EXACTLY (EDIT1) the same.

Great concept, though.

EDIT1: It would look EXACTLY the same.

NOTE: Just like Gmail, Wave has keyboard shortcuts that work in-browser. Since these are in fact your browser slimmed down, the keyboard shortcuts work as they should.

NOTE2: I could compile an identical app of Waveboard in Adobe AIR in about an hour.
NEWS HEADLINES: Someone used a super-easy platform to display a website in a window! Here is a screenshot of the famous app: [Shows the Google Wave website] There it is! If I were to open the real application, it would be the same thing without any menus or buttons.

Final Notes: In summary, I could just make a shortcut on my desktop to go to the Wave website, and it would load just about as fast. Nothing to install, and it's the full-featured thing-a-ma-gig that is advertised to install. Bonus of using a browser: If I am done with Google Wave, I can just use my address bar to go to whatever I want next. No witing for browser to reopen.

]]> By: wiiman96 http://www.rotorblog.com/2009/11/09/google-wave-desktop-client-match-up-waver-vs-waveboard/comment-page-1/#comment-197760 wiiman96 Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:00:37 +0000 http://www.rotorblog.com/?p=4758#comment-197760 Great concepts, yes, but they are both just a browser window (without the buttons) with the wave website in them. Waver just uses a user-agent from iPhone to view the iPhone Wave Webapp. If someone would actually redesign the GUI to work with an API, maybe it could be called an application. In fact, I could have the same exact GUI for Waveboard by going to Wave in Google Chrome, and create an "application shortcut" to the site. It would look almost EXACTLY (EDIT1) the same.<br><br>Great concept, though.<br><br>EDIT1: It would look EXACTLY the same.<br><br>NOTE: Just like Gmail, Wave has keyboard shortcuts that work in-browser. Since these are in fact your browser slimmed down, the keyboard shortcuts work as they should. <br><br>NOTE2: I could compile an identical app of Waveboard in Adobe AIR in about an hour.<br>NEWS HEADLINES: Someone used a super-easy platform to display a website in a window! Here is a screenshot of the famous app: [Shows the Google Wave website] There it is! If I were to open the real application, it would be the same thing without any menus or buttons.<br><br> Final Notes: In summary, I could just make a shortcut on my desktop to go to the Wave website, and it would load just about as fast. Nothing to install, and it's the full-featured thing-a-ma-gig that is advertised to install. Bonus of using a browser: If I am done with Google Wave, I can just use my address bar to go to whatever I want next. No witing for browser to reopen. Great concepts, yes, but they are both just a browser window (without the buttons) with the wave website in them. Waver just uses a user-agent from iPhone to view the iPhone Wave Webapp. If someone would actually redesign the GUI to work with an API, maybe it could be called an application. In fact, I could have the same exact GUI for Waveboard by going to Wave in Google Chrome, and create an “application shortcut” to the site. It would look almost EXACTLY (EDIT1) the same.

Great concept, though.

EDIT1: It would look EXACTLY the same.

NOTE: Just like Gmail, Wave has keyboard shortcuts that work in-browser. Since these are in fact your browser slimmed down, the keyboard shortcuts work as they should.

NOTE2: I could compile an identical app of Waveboard in Adobe AIR in about an hour.
NEWS HEADLINES: Someone used a super-easy platform to display a website in a window! Here is a screenshot of the famous app: [Shows the Google Wave website] There it is! If I were to open the real application, it would be the same thing without any menus or buttons.

Final Notes: In summary, I could just make a shortcut on my desktop to go to the Wave website, and it would load just about as fast. Nothing to install, and it's the full-featured thing-a-ma-gig that is advertised to install. Bonus of using a browser: If I am done with Google Wave, I can just use my address bar to go to whatever I want next. No witing for browser to reopen.

]]> By: judy981 http://www.rotorblog.com/2009/11/09/google-wave-desktop-client-match-up-waver-vs-waveboard/comment-page-1/#comment-197208 judy981 Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:25:18 +0000 http://www.rotorblog.com/?p=4758#comment-197208 <a href="http://www.discountMbt.com/" rel="nofollow">Mbt shoes</a> are delivered around the world, <a href="http://www.discountMbt.com/Mbt-lami-c-3.html" rel="nofollow">Mbt Lami</a>, <a href="http://www.discountMbt.com/Mbt-mwalk-c-2.html" rel="nofollow">Mbt m walk</a> are in stock. Mbt shoes are delivered around the world, Mbt Lami, Mbt m walk are in stock.

]]> By: Darko http://www.rotorblog.com/2009/11/09/google-wave-desktop-client-match-up-waver-vs-waveboard/comment-page-1/#comment-197062 Darko Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:12:11 +0000 http://www.rotorblog.com/?p=4758#comment-197062 Amazing blog. Keep up the good work! Amazing blog. Keep up the good work!

]]> By: wextensions http://www.rotorblog.com/2009/11/09/google-wave-desktop-client-match-up-waver-vs-waveboard/comment-page-1/#comment-197014 wextensions Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:19:42 +0000 http://www.rotorblog.com/?p=4758#comment-197014 A new Google wave robot for Iphone has arrived that sends auto reminder. Check details @ <a href="http://www.wextensions.com" rel="nofollow">www.wextensions.com</a> A new Google wave robot for Iphone has arrived that sends auto reminder. Check details @ http://www.wextensions.com

]]> By: WaveNut http://www.rotorblog.com/2009/11/09/google-wave-desktop-client-match-up-waver-vs-waveboard/comment-page-1/#comment-196990 WaveNut Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:42:34 +0000 http://www.rotorblog.com/?p=4758#comment-196990 I personally like waveboard better since it has more functionality.<br><br><a href="http://www.wavenut.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wavenut.com</a> I personally like waveboard better since it has more functionality.

http://www.wavenut.com

]]>